my article is talking about the difference between most american FMA and most filipino FMA. you cannot deny that the arts get treated differently in this country to back home. the attitudes of the people are different, the customs, even the preferred to train differently. reputations are built differently, and we value different parts of the arts, and reputations mean different things to filipino teachers vs american teachers.

there is no harm in differences. this is what makes styles and competition between teachers and schools. with everyone hiding from difference, we end up not prepared for the situation when you cannot make someone your friend.

i believe the fact that we are different to each other makes the filipino martial arts more interesting. my article is not saying “this is beter than the other one”, even though i might be obvious which i prefer, but opinions are not something that have to be kept to ourselves.

It is very difficult to write or speak in absolutes… Each person approaches, studies, teaches and expresses the arts in their own way.

Geographical location and the color of your skin does not have anything to do with effectiveness. If it works for the individual, no matter where they live, learn, practice, teach and fight —- then who is anyone to say anything about it.

How can you justisfy the judgement of all Americans who practice FMA based upon your opinion of a limited facts or exposure?

The reality is that:

“Blessed by the same sun and bathed by the same rains…. Each tree will grow and flourish, each according to their unique characteristics”.

It would be better for all if we looked for common ground and a
bridge to improve both cultures and individuals rather than adopt a “you” verse “me” approach.

Peace be with you,

Mark