Where I Would Like to See FMAs
I was reflecting on the dissatisfaction I am experiencing with the state of Filipino martial arts tournaments. There is no secret that I would like to see empty handed fighting divisions in FMA tournament. But I think our Eskrima tournaments can use an overhaul in the way the stick is applied in the sparring division (not to mention a complete BAN on Eskrima “kata”… I just don’t like them!) because one thing I do agree with many of our Eskrima brothers is that our tournaments simply aren’t “real enough” (are any tournaments short of death matches really real enough?). There are a few ways we can modify how our tournaments are arranged.
First, I believe that the weapons we simulate in tournaments should be judged and ruled as whatever those weapons are supposed to be. So in that case, I believe that a hit to the body should count for only 1/4 of a hit to the head or a hit to the forearm or hand. In Eskrima tournaments, we simply don’t award enough for hits to the hand, whereas the hand and forearm are perhaps some of the best targets for stickfighters and knife fighters alike. A hit to the head is something that shouldn’t be necessary to hit 25 – 50 times in order to win a match; three times should count as “game” to an automatic win.
Secondly, if there were bladed divisions, such as Bolo or thrusting sword divisions, we should use the Japanese style of “Ippon Kumite”, meaning that an unanswered, killing blow that is recognized by all judges would automatically count as a win. That would alleviate all the back and forth confusion/trading that modern Eskrima is known for. To be honest, when I competed in the Philippines, we always knew who was winning. When I watch the tournaments today, it is very difficult to score. I actually prefer the point system used by some of the Stockton Eskrima clubs to score their matches. However, I do miss the combination-style hitting that I train to use.
Lastly, focus should be on the landing of strong, clean blows that–in real combat–would incapacitate the opponent. If we did this, we could actually have challenging matches with not just our Eskrima sticks, but allow the use of other weapons, such as the spear, the staff, the knife, and even the Bayonet. (Yes, the Bayonet. Maybe some of you from the province forget that our old men taught this weapon as part of the Eskrima we studied. Some of us are actually embarassed by this weapon, as if the Bayonet made our systems look “country” and unsophisticated. Check out Big Stick Combat’s article on this weapon) Doing this will really raise the esteem and respect of our native arts in the minds of spectators and participants alike.
My inspiration: I read Darrin Cook’s article a few days ago on the bayonet, and thought about a Japanese weapon that is very similar to the Bayonet art I learned as a teenager, the Naginata. When I was a young man, I had the chance to spar with a young lady who had learned this weapon as a girl, and found that the techniques she taught me (after whipping me good) were identical to the Bayonet techniques I learned as a boy. When I searched youtube for something similar, I came across this clip (below) of a Naginata competition, and I realized that this is how I’d like to see the Filipino Martial Arts showcased–in a way that highlights its strengths and allows it to keep its dignity as a fighting art despite being a competition/spectator sport.
Please check it out and see if you agree with me. Thanks for visiting my blog!
Loading...
I couldn’t agree more. Continuous sparring in FMA’s looks a mess. I’ve tried to explain how it’s scored/judged and I think I confused myself trying to explain! LOL More structured rules with more/less points given for certain technique’s and/or combo’s, may help in this area. I would even suggest make the body armor, gloves “less” padded so when hit you would feel it, and players be more apt to protect yourself rather than trade a hit for a hit. Use defense and counter or offense to counter, but don’t get hit.
The Naginata looks nice, but might get more from it if I knew what was legal/illegal, and how points were scored.
stixzman - February 8, 2010 at 4:47 am
i like the flags method of calling points, but they don’t stop the action. and your right about less padding, because it makes it hard to just ignore a hit and keep going. this part is way to non-realistic.
thekuntawman - February 26, 2010 at 7:31 am
Thanks for citing my blog. I’m in total agreement on the FMA tournament scene (I’ve commented here. http://bigstickcombat.wordpress.com/2010/01/02/the-problem-with-stick-fighting-tournaments/)
I’m in favor of keeping the kata (anyo or sayaw) because I believe it’s traditional, and part of the art. And that’s the key –I don’t think spectators at the tournament are seeing art, or skill.
The naginata competition and French la canne are on the right track. Even if I don’t know how it’s scored, I can see defenses and when someone gets hit. I’ve seen eskrima point sparring that looks good. But the go-for-broke headhunting without any regard for defense just looks like a mess
bigstickcombat - February 8, 2010 at 2:24 pm